Monday, December 2, 2013

C_Club #13: Villette by Charlotte Brontë

Villette was the Classics Spin #2 pick for me back in the summer, which means that I read it a while back so everything that happened (or didn't happen) in the book is not that fresh in my mind anymore; however, as this is a remarkable book in several ways, I want to write about it nevertheless.
 
This is not a happy book. Nor is it a particularly easy piece to read. But it is a good book and the kind that sucks you in if you manage to switch off everything around yourself and dedicate your time and energy to the text on the pages. If you know French a bit I'd say you are in a good place, there is a lot of French used in the book and it can be a bit distracting to keep browsing to the notes in the back of the book all the time. I speak no French at all.
 
Lucy Snowe is a character of the kind I have not met before in a book, I think. Her life is kind of sad; she is not blessed with wealth nor looks and she does not have much of family or friends. She is a governess, and an intelligent woman and with wise views, with curiousity towards the world and her own inner self. There are plenty of battles shown, of what is going on inside Lucy's head although if you would be looking from outside, you would probably not describe her as a passionate person. Lucy is very independent in her thinking and she does not want to rely on anyone or expect anything from anyone. In ways she can be very strict in her views (the whole topic of religion), but on the other hand she accepts the diversity and differences that the life creates (or does she sigh sadly and just take it as inevitability?) in a very mature way:
 
Religious reader, you will preach to me a long sermon about what I have just written, and so will you, moralist, and you, stern sage: you, stoic, will frown; you, cynic, sneer; you, epicure, laugh. Well, each and all, take it your own way. I accept the sermon, frown, sneer and laugh; perhaps you are all right: and perhaps, circumstanced like me, you would have been, like me, wrong.
/p. 173/
 
The longer we live, the more our experience widens; the less prone are we to judge our neighbour's conduct, to question the world's wisdom: [...]
/p. 343/
 
Lucy does not come off the kind of dreaming, romatic woman that is often encountered in literature. She can be rather snarky and blunt in her narrative:
 
Independently of romantic rubbish, however, that old garden has its charms.
/p.118/
 
I got the impression that she is a very sensitive person, but at the same time quite defensive towards the world. She is very self-reflective, but also, as a narrator, not completely reliable because she does not reveal everything at once.
 
The ending of Villette is controversial and although I would like to talk about it, I better not because, well, spoiling. It's the kind of ending that makes some people angry because perhaps they do not get what they were after when reading this book, but I personally loved it. I think it is the type of ending that respects the intelligence of the reader.
 
If you read Charlotte Brontë's Jane Eyre and loved it, I would encourage you to pick up Villette, but whether and how much you would enjoy it is unknown. It is a very different book, much deeper and darker, and more difficult to follow; if you like Jane Eyre mainly because of romance, then I am not sure you will get the exact same thing from Villette; however, if you like well-written and deeply character-driven books then this one is an excellent choice.

Sunday, December 1, 2013

Closing the lid of November, Sunday Snippets #14


Season's greetings from a grumpy Robert.
 
Somehow I managed to read 10 books in November... it must have been the new Kindle, because it definitely made me read more overall. 3 out of those 10 I read on e-reader.
 
* A Trick of the Light, Lois Metzger (3/5)
* Shades of Grey, Jasper Fforde (3/5)
* The Sisters Brothers, Patrick deWitt (4/5)
* The Turn of the Screw, Henry James (CC) (1/5)
* Escape from Camp 14, Blaine Harden (5/5)
* Roverandom, J.R.R. Tolkien (5/5)
* The Moonstone, Wilkie Collins (CC) (4/5)
* UFO in Her Eyes, Xiaolu Guo (4/5)
* Parasite, Mira Grant (3/5)
 
 
A quick look back to this Top Ten Tuesday, where I set 10 books that I want to read this autumn. The result is 6/10 and I am happy with it; I am just a bit disappointed I didn't read neither of the two, The Poisonwood Bible nor NW.
 
There are a few books I want to read/finish in December:
 
* the Classics Club Spin book Cranford;
A Christmas Carol by Charles Dickens - what other time for this than December?
* I want to finish Vonnegut's Slaughterhouse-Five, at last;
* I want to finish Hannu Rajaniemi's The Quantum Thief;
* I would like to start (and finish!) The Lies of Locke Lamora by Scott Lynch.
 
I didn't even realise how this cover of Cranford matches with my Christmas PJs.
 
We'll see how it goes, there will probably be other books distracting me from those as well (I've had some serious non-fiction appetite lately). The two-month sci-fi reading event starts today as well, so I better put together an initial reading list for this.
 
I'm thinking of taking on a project for the month of December to tame the pile of To Be Reviewed books... The ratio between the books I read and the books I review is really getting out of control. Right now I've got *checking the notebook* 12 books to review, and a part of me wants to be done with all the 2013 books before the end of 2013, so if I review one book in two days, this should be doable. Some of these reviews will not be long, I am willing to give myself some maneuvering space there, because I know that taking on a task too demanding can end in a failure.
 
Watching:
 
I am not sure what is wrong with me, but ever since we went to see Gravity in movie theater earlier this month, I've been loving all things space-y (my Kindle is full of samples of non-fiction on space exploration...) Especially when it comes to watching something, it's been impossible to steer away from the space drama. I don't remember when we started watching Babylon 5 - I think it might have been this month, and we are already in Season 3. Yeah....... We also saw Space Cowboys, which wasn't anything life-changing, but it was entertaining in several ways. Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban was such a disappointment. Given that it has one of the highest scores out of all the HP movies on IMDB, I am not sure what went wrong. The story in the film felt completely disjointed, at least coming from having read the book fairly recently. I enjoyed the first two movies, but this one just made me fall asleep over and over again.
 
I wish everyone a happy holiday month. I am sorting my Christmas decorations today and maybe we will put up the star on the window - it would already be done if there was a spare light bulb in the household.

Saturday, November 30, 2013

C_Club #12: The Moonstone by Wilkie Collins


The Moonstone read-a-long has ended and this time I actually managed to stay in schedule and finish the book! Hoorays all around.
 
Here is my half-way-there, a bit spoilerish post. In the second half of the book the narrators were no longer as eccentric as Gabriel Betteredge (with his self-help book Robinson Crusoe) and Drusilla Clack ("Satan under the tea table!"), so naturally the first half of the book was a lot funnier and also a lot more quotable than the second half. Let me demonstrate through a visual:
 
First half of the book in the bottom, second half in the top.
 
It takes quite some time until the disappearance of the diamond actually comes to the focus, but in the end it does, and just as many have said, the ending of the book is quite satisfactory. I think those who expect pure mystery out of The Moonstone might be a bit disappointed because it almost feels like solving the riddle is second rate, after all the drama and schenanigans; also, I usually cannot guess a culprit when I read and I even try avoid doing it because I want to be surprised, but in The Moonstone, it was kind of obvious who went after the stone. To me, anyway. So, it wasn't very surprising in the end, but it sure was satisfying.
 
Ezra Jennings was probably the most interesting narrator in the second half of the book, I took him as a different kind of martyr than Ms Clack - he did trigger a lot of sympathy with the situation that he was in and that led to the actions that he took. From others' reviews and remarks I've concluded that Rachel Verinder is not a very popular girl and even though I can understand the negative emotions she brings out, I think she is a good character who doesn't allow people use her as a carpet, so to say. I symphatised with her, being so young, in such a mess, with no proper guidance. From what I remember, being 17-18 years old, I wasn't exactly a pillar of morality and mature decisions myself, is what I guess I'm trying to say here.
 
Having read The Woman in White earlier this year, I can't help but compare the two books, and I have to say I liked The Woman in White better. One of the reasons is that with The Woman in White, I had yet no idea of the awesomeness of Wilkie's (I think we have all adopted the first name relationship with him) writing, so the delight was genuine; in case of The Moonstone, I had way high expectations. Secondly, I think there was more solid bunch of hilarious/kickass characters in The Woman in White (Frederik "Don't Bully Me!" Fairlie, Count Fosco - the kind you love and hate at the same time, of course Marian "Petticoats for Life!" Halcombe, Professor Pesca, Fosco's wife... looks like you could list all the characters here).
 
But overall, I was highly entertained by the Moonstone and gave it good 4 out of 5 stars.
 
Thank you Ellie for organising, I really loved the event!

Thursday, November 28, 2013

The 2014 TBR Pile Challenge

 
Adam from Roof Beam Reader is hosting The 2014 TBR Pile Challenge. For the fifth year! Congratulations on the anniversary! Click on the link to head over to the main post of the challenge, to learn about the rules and prizes.
 
I don't know any bookworm who didn't constantly complain over the size of their TBR pile, so this will be one of my chosen challenges for next year.

I've added the first publication dates.

1. The Name of the Rose, Umberto Eco (1980) (CC) - 4/5
2. Wolf Hall, Hilary Mantel (2009)
3. Middlesex, Jeffrey Eugenides (2002) (CC) - 5/5 - impressions
4. Oliver Twist, Charles Dickens (1837) (CC)
5. The Kite Runner, Khaled Hosseini (2003) - 2/5 - review
6. Tender Is the Night, F. Scott Fitzgerald (1933) (CC)
7. Honour, Elif Shafak (2011) - review - 4/5
8. The Pillars of the Earth, Ken Follett (1989)
9. The Name of the Wind, Patrick Rothfuss (2007) - 3/5 -  review
10. Why Be Happy If You Could Be Normal, Jeanette Winterson (2011) - 4/5 -  review
11. The Thousand Autumns of Jacob de Zoet, David Mitchell (2010) - 5/5 -  review
12. Rebecca, Daphne du Maurier (1938) (CC) - 5/5
 
The alternatives are both non-fiction books from my TBR list because among other things, I want to put more focus on non-fiction in 2014:
 
 
 

Sunday, November 24, 2013

Sunday Snippets #13

Oh dear, I haven't made a single Sunday post in November. On the other hand, I've been posting quite frequently, compared to most other months, so I'm happy that the blogging mojo is back!
 
The weather here in Helsinki is still autumny - no sight of snow yet. Let's keep it like that until at least December. It looks like people are slowly starting to prepare for Christmas and although I am very down-to-earth when it comes to any kind of holiday, I know this year will be the kind in which I embrace the whole holiday feeling. Last year the whole holidays went just past me - we didn't even bring the tree because it seemed completely pointless. It changes from year to year. Today I got some candles and a glittery red flower pot for my biggest cactus, which looks really festive. I've also gotten a few gifts for Jan.
 
I've spent a fair amount of time getting to know the Kindle that I got for birthday and I must say I am very happy with it. It doesn't replace physical books, but I can now be a bit more selective in which books I decide to buy to occupy the shelves. I also intend to read first books in any series on Kindle to see if I want to continue with the series, and then if I like the first book, I will consider buying physical copies.
 
Kindle definitely has its perks when it comes to reading in kitchen.
 
I've also been reading a lot - we are in the middle of The Moonstone readalong still (I think I have a few pages until the end), I read two non-fiction books on e-reader (about the first Moon landing by humans, and about the only man who has managed to escape North-Korean concentration camp), now I'm reading Parasite by Mira Grant on Kindle (half way through - it's a bit of a disturbing read), I also bought several virtual books that I want to read like now - The Thirteenth Tale by Diane Setterfield and The Lies of Locke Lamora by Scott Lynch (waves to Sarah and Ekaterina). And there's all the science fiction that I want to read lately - Carl's Sci-Fi Experience reading event is coming up next month so come sign up if you feel like it. I haven't made a list for the event yet, but there will be some awesome books featured.
 
I'm looking forward to next week, there will be a long-waited-for concert taking place on Tuesday evening and we will be seeing Blue Jasmine in the movie theater on Thursday.
 
Overall, I am very happy with where I am with reading and blogging at the moment (review posts - not so much, but I'll try to make a few next week), and may that continue.
 
Happy end of November, everyone!

Thursday, November 21, 2013

My TOP10 Sci-Fi Movies

 
 
I was inspired (again!) by Rinn over at Rinn Reads - here is her post.
 
Today we are talking about our favourite Sci-Fi movies of all time. Mine are in alphabetical order, because although I love lists, it's hard for me to choose which is best, and which is a bit less good. It was difficult to choose only 10, but I just kept removing the films one by one, and these are the ones I was left with:
 
2001
 

With Haley Joel Osment, Jude Law, Frances O'Connor.
 
In the future society, humans have created realistic robots (called mechas) to serve them. But can mechas really have feelings and what happens when they are no longer wanted?
 
Why favourite: the topic of artificial intelligence is ever interesting - even if we program robots to "feel", are those then true feelings?

1979
 
 
With Sigourney Weaver.
 
Spaceship Nostromo is surprised by an unwanted extraterrestrial visitor.
 
Why favourite: mad scientist doctor following orders of a mega corporation is willing to jeopardise the whole mankind in the name of science. Hilarity and horror ensue; time to place your bets - will the mad scientist be the first to die? Also, Ellen Ripley is a kick ass character.
 
Sequels: Aliens (1986), Alien 3 (1992), Alien: Resurrection (1997).

1985
 
 
With Michael J. Fox, Christopher Lloyd, Lea Thompson
 
A teenager is sent 30 years into the past in a time-travel car constructed by his buddy mad Doctor Emmett Brown; he must bring together his high-school age parents to save his own future existence.
 
Why favourite: Who can say no to time travel, hilarious characters and awesome 80ties-90ties clothing style? Also, it's one of those rare cases where sequels are excellent too.
 

2012
 

 
With Tom Hanks, Halle Berry, Hugo Weaving, Jim Broadbent, Hugh Grant, Susan Sarandon.
 
How do the actions of individual lives impact each other in the past, present and future?
 
Why favourite: I am not even going to pretend I am not biased here - this book is so good that it probably contributed a few points towards the movie making it to TOP 10. This is a very complex, layered story that takes place in the past, present and future. This kind of heavyweight of Hollywood stars would usually shy me away from the movie, but in Cloud Atlas they earn their money - literally, since everyone plays several different characters.

1997
 
 
With Maurice Dean Wint, David Hewlett, Nicole de Boer, Nicky Guadagni, Andrew Miller, Julian Richings, Waybe Robson.
 
Seven people who do not know each other wake up in a giant cube, filled with thousands of different rooms. They start figuring out why they are there while trying to find the way out of cube, each room is full of unknown traps.
 
Why favourite: Look at that concept! (Though sequels are of questionable value, I would not recommend.) The cost of this film must have been super low because everything takes place in rooms that look pretty much the same... except you can die in hundreds of different ways. Also, Cube proves that mathematics can be really scary.
 
Sequels: Cube 2: Hypercube (2002), Cube Zero (2004).

2002
 
 
With Christian Bale, Taye Diggs, Sean Bean, Emily Watson.
 
In a Fascist future where all forms of feeling are illegal, a man in charge of enforcing the law rises to overthrow the system.
 
Why favourite: For me personally, this takes the cake as the most underrated movie ever. If you like books 1984 and Fahrenheit 451, chances are good you will like this movie. Also, how awesome is this cast.

2010


With Leonardo DiCaprio, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Ellen Page, Tom Hardy, Ken Watanabe, Marion Cotillard, Michael Caine.
 
What if someone steals your thoughts and secrets while you are sleeping? Can you get lost in a dream never to return? Will you even want to?
 
Why favourite: Based on all these questions - another fascinating concept (or more like a proper mindf**k that requires several viewings). Also, Christopher Nolan and the cadre of people assembled for this film are impressive.

1999
 
 
With Keanu Reeves, Laurence Fishburne, Carrie-Anne Moss, Hugo Weaving.
 
In future, hackers are capable of hacking into human mind. The battle between reality and artificial reality.
 
Why favourite? This film was launched at the time when computer geekness was spreading its wings, and I was already on board. I was also attracted to the cool black leather coats and shades. The slo-mo fight scenes were a very new thing back then! (What happened to the sequels, though? From bad to worse.)
 
Sequels: The Matrix Reloaded (2003), The Matrix Revolutions (2003).
 
2009
 
 
With Sam Rockwell, Kevin Spacey.
 
Future mankind has discovered how to solve the Earth's energy problems with the help of the Moon and astronaut Sam Bell is to spend three years on the Moon, only companion his computer GERTY.
 
Why favourite: it is kind of a minimalist setting - lunar station, a bit of the Moon's surface, one man and one computer. Lots can happen when a man has to spend such a long alone in the space...

2012
 
 
With Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Bruce Willis, Emily Blunt.
 
The year is 2074 and people who have become trouble are sent 30 years back in time to get executed. What if one day you are facing yourself on the execution scene?
 
Why favourite? I can't resist a time conundrum. Nothing more enjoyable than spending the rest of your evening (or few days, or weeks) trying to figure out the time paradox (if you go back in time and kill yourself, how can you be there to go back in time in the first place?)
 
Bonus entry:

2013
 
 
With George Clooney, Sandra Bullock.
 
A medical engineer and an astronaut are the sole survivors of an accident that destroys their space station, but oxygen is running low, so what next?
 
Why favourite: It is a tragic, beautiful survival story. The space is beautiful, especially if you view it through 3D glasses safely in the movie theater! The details that are put into this movie are astonishing and although there are a few scenes that make you think "IS THIS REALLY POSSIBLE?" (and if you are like me, make you manically google at home afterwards :p), it does not take away from the fact that this movie is brilliant.

"They put a man on the moon, man on the moon"

I'm a bit of a space geek. After seeing the movie Gravity a few days back, I had a serious movie hangover and I was just craving for some "space stuff" so I bought the book "Flying to the Moon: An Astronaut's Story" on my Kindle and inhaled it last night.
 
(And also, if you have even the slightest interest in "the space stuff", or can just appreciate a very beautiful movie, please go see Gravity in 3D. I am willing to go as far as to say it is, over a long time, the first decent thing come out of Hollywood, and also, I finally realised the meaning and purpose of 3D - I am not the biggest fan of multi-dimensional movie experience, but this film you just don't want to see in any other way.)
 
But let's talk about the book instead. Author Michael Collins was one of the three astronauts that performed the first successful lunar landing by humans, back in July 1969. The crew consisted of him, Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin. Collins was the only one of the three who didn't actually step on the Moon, his task was to remain in the command module on Moon's orbit and pick up the lunar module again after Armstrong and Aldrin had planted the US flag onto the surface of the Moon. It is natural that we mainly talk about Neil Armstrong as "the first man on the Moon", but if you read this book, you realise that without Collins, neither of the other two would have made it back home at all.  
 
Heart muscles and circadian rhythms were interesting things to know about, but they were not the most important things, as far as we astronauts were concerned. We were most concerned about understanding the spacecraft, which was a very complicated bundle of machinery – any part of which could break.
 
Collins starts this book from "the beginning" - how he became an astronaut and how astronauts were trained for NASA space exploration programmes (did you know that astronauts have to go through the jungle and desert training, in case they land their spacecraft in the middle of Sahara and need to survive until the rescue team arrives, or that they had to study geology to know which rocks to bring back from the Moon? fascinating!); he introduces his 13 companions from NASA Group 3, formed in 1963, and explains how each astronaut had a different task and things to learn when it came to knowing the spacecrafts they were to fly (for example, Collins himself was responsible for the development of space suits - it is proper science and like he said himself, it takes a scientist and a designer to put together an efficient, well-functioning space suit). He takes reader through his two space flights, first on the two-man spacecraft Gemini 10 and the second on Apollo 11, which made the successful Moon landing. He also talks about the catastrophic takeoff of Apollo 1, which was supposed to be the first manned spacecraft performing the lunar landing and which caught fire while still on the Earth, killing all three astronauts inside.
 
Apollo 11 crew - Armstrong, Collins, Aldrin.
Link.
 
Back in 1969, the technology was not nearly on the level that it is now, so naturally, flying to the Moon was in a way, much more an achievement than it would be now. Long story short, Armstrong and Aldrin were to land on the Moon, plant the flag, collect some Moon surface and then return to the Moon orbit in their lunar module Eagle, where they would be picked up by Collins in the spacecraft. Sounds simple, but Collins had a whole pile of scenarios for "what could go wrong" cases. Luckily nothing went wrong and all three arrived safely to the Earth.
 
In earth orbit, it takes ninety minutes to go around once. During this hour and a half, the astronaut will see one sunrise, one noontime, one sunset, and one midnight.
 
Buzz Aldrin poses with the US flag.
Link.
 
In total, feet of 12 men have touched the surface of the Moon. All 12 have been Americans and have flown Apollo spacecrafts. The last Moon landing took place in 1972, which might seem like an odd thing considering the development of technology and science, but not really that strange when we think about why the Moon exploration began in the first place - it was a space race between the Soviet Union and the USA, and when Soviets were the first to send a man to space (Yuri Gagarin was the first man in outer space, April 1961), Americans were determined to be the first ones to land men on the Moon. After six successful landings between 1969 and 1972, the subsidies to NASA space programme were cut drastically. Americans had made their point to the Soviets, and also, there was not that much to explore anymore at that stage, so later planned flights did not justify their cost.
 
Apollo 11 before the launch, Cape Canaveral, Florida.
This link has a multitude of awesome photos regarding the whole Apollo 11 programme.
 
Okay, I've been rambling over the geeky stuff for a long while now (for which I apologise - I realise not everyone finds space as fascinating!); I'll end with a few comments about the text itself. Michael Collins is of course no writer (he has other talents!), but he does write in a gripping way and almost makes you feel like you are in the spacecraft with him and his co-pilots (by the way, they never say "space capsule" - capsule is something you swallow, apparently :)). His style is very down to earth and matter of fact, but there are a few places where he tries to be funny (sometimes he succeeds, but in chapter 4 not really), or where he is more poetic, describing the total silence, quietness and loneliness of the space. (Space blues gets me every time.) The end bit was especially funny as he speculated over the possibility of human life in space, on Moon and even on Mars. He figured it would be possible to build a human town or settlement in the space and create a mini society, only we would have the problem of floating cows, due to weightlessness. This end part was a bit funny and a bit naive, but also made me go aww, considering it was written fair time back (1976, revised 1994) - it is nice to have dreams.
 
In conclusion, I recommend this book to any space geek - it's highly fascinating and gripping, and point of view of the first man who flew to the Moon, but didn't actually step on its surface.
 
An image of the Earth rise, shot by Apollo 11 crew.
Link.